Webhard

down site

When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only must be in a folder.

You need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It has a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you must find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.



There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)



웹하드 사이트 Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.